fix(protocol-contracts): remove unused function parameters in staking (N-04)#1689
Merged
melanciani merged 1 commit intomainfrom Jan 5, 2026
Conversation
🧪 CI InsightsHere's what we observed from your CI run for 091d73b. 🟢 All jobs passed!But CI Insights is watching 👀 |
jatZama
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2026
Member
jatZama
left a comment
jatZama
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I approve, since we no longer plan to follow the async vault standard, same as for the event update, but do not forget to update the front-end here as well.
melanciani
changed the title
melanciani
deleted the
melanciani/fix/protocol-contracts/staking/remove_unused_params
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove unused first parameter from
pendingRedeemRequestandclaimableRedeemRequestfunctions in OperatorStaking contract.refs https://github.com/zama-ai/fhevm-internal/issues/826